St_JtB wrote:I don't believe the 'gnostic' brand fits, due to the deliberate contradiction in my logic. But hey - find me a box & I'll make sure it doesn't fit.
Plus, the term "gnostic" is already taken:
Wikipedia wrote:...in a religious context, to be 'Gnostic' should be understood as being reliant not on knowledge in a general sense, but as being specially receptive to mystical or esoteric experiences of direct participation with the divine. Indeed, in most Gnostic systems the sufficient cause of salvation is this 'knowledge of' ('acquaintance with') the divine.
Does that make me an a-agnostic, and, according to my previous statement wouldn't that make me an a-a-agnostic as well.
You could just use an infinite number of 'a's at the beginning, then attach "gnostic" at the end. Since infinity has as much claim to being even as it does to being odd, you've covered both bases.