Detective TurtleHolmes wrote: Capellini wrote: Detective TurtleHolmes wrote:
Why thank you, it does indeed look tasty.
Don't look now, but there's nipple in this one. I didn't notice it till afterwards, and I can't be bothered to make a new one at the moment.
Dammit, who is putting my photos on the 'net???
Whoever said they were put on the net?
Why are you apologising? What's wrong with nipples? Everyone's got at least two!
I've often wondered why women aren't supposed to show our
nipples, but men are allowed to show theirs. OK, so we have varying amount of fat behind ours which most men don't have; but we are allowed to show that.
Just so long as we cover up the nipples which anyone can see on men anyway.
Not apologising, warning. People may be offended, it seems something akin to porn, a big no no on this forum, zombies...
DETh...Would any of us still be posting-priveledged members if THAT was the level of reactionary hysteria overyoke-ing us?...i thinks not...i thanks god.
@ cap...and here i had you pegged as a tightly wound type-a control freak...I guess I'm only half-right...you do loosen up partially.
I love that...the way you worded that makes people into absurd buffoons and idiots.
*wipes tear*I love reality-based posts...
(How 'bout this one?)(after j.jackson's"wardrobe-malfunction")
I thought, from now on, whenever they show animals on tv, like nature shows, farm-reports, zoos, etc....They should blur/pixellate the genitals and udders.
COMPLETELY SANS COMMENT...
...and let the home viewer puzzle it out.